Godaddy

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Freedom vs. Sharia Law

Ted Nugent
By Ted Nugent
10/21/2010

We've been told there are so-called moderate Muslims who deplore terrorism and that Islam has been hijacked by extremists.


If there are in fact moderate Muslims, they have been quiet as mosque mice regarding their positions. For example, Americans don't know if moderate Muslims recognize Israel, what they think about women's rights, or if they believe the proposed New York City mosque should be moved to another location out of concern and sensitivity for the families of the victims of 9/11.


We also don't know if there are other freedom-loving and freedom-fighting Muslims who respect the rights of others to burn the Koran, draw cartoons of Mohammad in newspapers, hold marches to condemn Hamas and other terror organizations, write unflattering books about Islam, and vigorously support allowing people of other faiths to practice their faith in the city of Mecca where all other religions besides Islam are currently outlawed.


If there are Muslims who hold these moderate beliefs they are surely as rare as a Southern Baptist holding a Sunday morning church revival in Mecca.


Americans may not know much about Islam or its followers, but what we do know is that bloodthirsty terrorism is more often than not carried out by crazy-eyed, Muslim voodoo monsters screaming "God Is Great!" while slaughtering innocent people. The Obama Administration refuses to use the word "Islam" in describing these terrorists out of concern it will offend Muslims. I’m offended this is our nation’s policy.


The Center for Security Policy, known as Team B, recently released a report that should give all of us, especially the Obama Administration, reason to reverse course.


Composed of security experts from both previous Republican and Democratic Presidents, the report urges the Obama Administration to reverse course on not referring to Muslim terrorists as "Islamist" out of fear they will offend Muslims around the world.


The most bone-chilling finding by Team B is that America faces the threat of Islamic Sharia law slowing poisoning our legal system and ultimately destroying it. Sharia law is the Islam doctrine of Allah ruling over everything including legal, political and military doctrine. Sharia law is incompatible to free or thinking people.


What the Obama Administration and Muslims will not tell Americans is that the ultimate goal of Islam is to take over the world and replace representative, constitutional governments with Sharia law. Under Sharia law, freedom as we know it would be put to the Islamic sword.


What the free world faces is an insidious, violent movement that respects nothing but their own revolutionary ideology: world domination. This threat is not unlike communism which President Reagan vocally denounced at every opportunity.


Sharia law should be banned in the United States and those Muslims and imams in America who advocate Sharia law should be charged with sedition. Trying to overthrow our constitutional government through peaceful or violent means should never be tolerated.


I support reaching out to moderate Muslims as Team B advocates. We need them to drive a wedge between the whacked out, voodoo Muslims and those who want to exist peacefully with others of different faiths. However, where are these moderate Muslims and what do they believe? Do they actually exist?


Sharia law will only be allowed to poison our legal system and culture if we allow it. We should stand steadfast against it, outlaw it and make it known throughout the world that America stands with freedom and that we will not compromise it away out of fear of upsetting Muslims or a false belief that we can co-exist with a religious revolution whose goal is to destroy America.


We know the Obama Administration will ignore the advice of the Team B. The question is, what does the GOP or the Tea Party think of the report and what will they do with it?

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Santorum Wants Special Prosecutor for Sestak Offer

Sestak-gate: White House Offered Romanoff Job, Too
Wednesday, 26 May 2010 08:18 PM

By: Jim Meyers

Allegations that the White House offered Joe Sestak a job in exchange for dropping out of the Pennsylvania Senate race echo an earlier report of a job offer to candidate Andrew Romanoff in Colorado.

On Sept. 27, 2009, the Denver Post reported that the Obama administration offered Senate candidate Romanoff a position if he canceled plans to run for the Democratic nomination against incumbent Sen. Michael Bennet.

The paper said the job offer, which specified particular jobs, reportedly was delivered by Jim Messina, Obama’s deputy chief of staff. One position the Post cited was a job at USAID, the foreign aid agency.

Messina contacted Romanoff soon after news leaked in August 2009 that Romanoff, former Colorado House speaker, would make a primary run against Bennet.

Romanoff turned down the offer and announced his candidacy. Obama then endorsed Bennet, who had been appointed in January 2009 to fill the seat vacated when Ken Salazar became secretary of the Interior.

But Romanoff trounced Bennet at last weekend's Colorado Democratic assembly, winning the top line on the August primary ballot.

The White House denied that Romanoff had been offered a job.

“Mr. Romanoff was never offered a position within the administration,” said White House spokesman Adam Abrams.

Nevertheless, the Denver Post disclosures may have worked against Bennet.

“People in Colorado have an adverse reaction to the external forces coming down and telling them how to think,” said Colorado state Rep. Kathleen Curry, a Romanoff supporter.

And the Post observed: “The timing of Messina’s latest intervention sparked particular concern — because of the appearance that the administration was trying to buy off a nettlesome opponent, to some; to others, because the timing made the effort appear so ham-handed.”

Earlier in 2009, Colorado Democrats recommended Romanoff for a position in the administration, spokesman Abrams acknowledged. But he said that, although “there were some initial conversations, no job was ever offered.”

Observers are taking a fresh look at the Romanoff story amid ongoing controversy over Rep. Sestak’s claim that he was offered a position in the Obama administration in exchange for dropping his primary challenge to Sen. Arlen Specter.

Sestak said the offer came in July 2009, a month before he announced his candidacy.

Fellow Democrat Dick Durbin of Illinois, the Senate majority whip, has called on Sestak to say more about the job offer.

Republicans, meanwhile, are pressuring the White House to divulge details about the offer. Rep. Darrell Issa of California, the ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has gone so far as to suggest a criminal probe in the matter.

Issa issued a statement saying: “For months, a United States congressman has stated that the White House offered him a job in exchange for not running in an election. We call this a bribe.

“Despite being asked numerous times, the White House has not refuted Congressman Sestak's allegations, but refuses to disclose who offered what and when. So this administration, that pledged to be a beacon of transparency and change, continues to conceal from the American people the truth about what exactly was said and offered.

“Until we get direct answers, this White House doesn't have a leg to stand on when they talk about openness and change.”

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Glenn takes no prisoners at CPAC

Glenn hit it In this video dead center, right between the eyes.

Monday, December 21, 2009

Fat heads And Meatheads

By Bob L.
12/21/09

Come 2010 elections are you going to do the same thing that you have done every Election year, put in OVER EDUCATED IDIOTS that don’t have an education more then a second grader.

This is short and sweet, you only get out of what you put in, and if you can’t see that that then you are just as stupid as those you put into office, people who lie just to get free medical for life, and perks that you the tax payer will pay until you changes the laws that they put in for them selves, So are you going to throw out every one of these slick willies, scam artists, what ever you want to call them, but all they want is a steady job and free money to add to their millions.

THROW OUT ALL THE BUMS AND DON'T LET THEM HAVE AN OTHER Government JOB and don’t allow any more of them in, most of them are ones that could not get a any other JOB.

Friday, December 18, 2009

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Ocean warming not Global

Here is some good shots of Ocean warming
And a raw video

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Health Care

Is our freedom being taken away with out our say?